0
  • No products in the cart.
Top
Biofertilizers for enhancing groundnut productivity - Kisan Suvidha
3401
post-template-default,single,single-post,postid-3401,single-format-standard,theme-wellspring,mkdf-bmi-calculator-1.0,mkd-core-1.0,woocommerce-no-js,wellspring-ver-1.2.1,mkdf-smooth-scroll,mkdf-smooth-page-transitions,mkdf-ajax,mkdf-blog-installed,mkdf-header-standard,mkdf-sticky-header-on-scroll-down-up,mkdf-default-mobile-header,mkdf-sticky-up-mobile-header,mkdf-dropdown-slide-from-bottom,mkdf-search-dropdown,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-4.12,vc_responsive

Biofertilizers for enhancing groundnut productivity

groundnut biofertilizers

Biofertilizers for enhancing groundnut productivity

Introduction

Groundnut is cultivated in around 6 million ha with an annual production of around 7 million tonnes in India. However, the productivity remains a matter of great concern as it remains around 1250 kg/ha in rainfed situations and around 1800 kg/ha under irrigated conditions. As 90% of the crop is grown under rainfed conditions, productivity is affected by the erratic and uneven distribution of rainfall, and in odd years the crop is badly affected by drought in most of the country.

In India, groundnut is mostly cultivated in marginal lands with suboptimal nutrient supply. Being a legume crop, most of its N requirement should be met from biological nitrogen fixation. With an average pod yield of 2 t/ha, there is a requirement of about 250 kg nitrogen. However, in rainfed and irrigated conditions, it is recommended to apply only 12.5 kg and 25 kg N/ha, respectively, and thus there is a requirement of about 200 kg of N being fixed by biological nitrogen fixation. However, groundnut is a promiscuous crop and is often nodulated by all the strains of rhizobia present in the tropics and sub-tropics. The situation is compounded further as native rhizobia often out-compete the inoculants strains. Thus, there is highly erratic biological nitrogen fixation in groundnut. Because of this, there is an acute imbalance in the nitrogen availability in groundnut, thus affecting the productivity.

Marginal lands are mostly deficient in available phosphorus, and an external application of P2O5 @ 40 kg /ha is recommended for groundnut cultivation. However, in acid soil, P is fixed as Fe- and Al-phosphates and in the alkaline soil it is fixed as tri-calcium phosphate. Thus, the P requirement of groundnut is seldom realized. To improve the phosphorus nutrition, inoculation with phosphate solubilizing microorganisms is helpful. The soil is also often deficient in micronutrients in different parts of the country, specially Fe, Mo, Zn, etc.

Thus, to enhance the productivity of groundnut, application of highly competitive strains of groundnut rhizobia, phosphate solubilizing microorganisms, plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR), AM fungi and other beneficial bacteria like endophytes would help in realizing good yield in a sustainable manner.

Biofertilizers in agriculture

Intensive commercial farming involves excessive use of agricultural land area through multiple cropping and uses of chemical fertilizers and pesticides as well. In the recent past, good quality of chemical fertilizers and pesticides have been employed in farmlands. It is feared that practice of uses of chemical fertilizers and pesticides continually would result in a gradual decrease in quality of soils especially regarding fertility. Use of agriculturally important microorganisms in different combinations is the only solution for restoration of soils.

To increase the unit area productivity of agricultural land, the role of different crop nutrients in contributing increased crop yield play a vital role. Among the crop nutrients, nitrogen, as well as phosphorus, plays an important role in increasing the crop productivity. Further, the nitrogenous chemical fertilizers are manufactured industrially using non-renewable petroleum products under high temperature and high pressure. Increase in petroleum cost day by day affects the cost of the chemical fertilizers. On the other hand, when increased doses of chemical fertilizers are used to increase crop production it causes environmental pollution and is also toxic to the soil as it kills the beneficial microorganisms. Plant nutrients like N, P, and K are highly essential for plant growth. The plants remove many nutrients from the soil in modern intensive cultivation and need replenishment. Under such conditions, microbes offer good alternative technology to replenish crop nutrients.

In agricultural eco-system, microorganisms are having a vital role in fixing/solubilizing /mobilizing /recycling nutrients. These microorganisms occur in soils naturally, but their populations are often scanty. The beneficial microbial population is occurring in soils always may not be supporting for higher crop yield. To increase the crop yield, the desired microbes from rhizosphere are isolated and artificially cultured in the adequate count and mixed with suitable carriers. These are known as biofertilizers or microbial inoculants. It includes Rhizobium, Azotobacter, Acetobacter, Azospirillum, phosphate solubilizing microorganisms (PSM), arbuscular mycorrhizae (AM fungi), plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR), micronutrient mobilizing bacteria like Thiobacillus sp., etc.

These biofertilizers are microbial inoculants, which contain living cells of efficient nitrogen fixing microorganisms, which fix atmospheric nitrogen either symbiotically with host plant or free living, phosphate solubilizing /mobilizing microorganisms as well as potassium mobilizers /release or mobilize P2O5 and K2O from the soil. These biofertilizers are available in markets as carrier based inoculants or as liquid inoculants.

Biofertilizers are inexpensive and eco-friendly. Many State Agricultural Universities, Govt. Agriculture/Forest Departments and a good number of commercial units in private and public sectors are producing and distributing biofertilizers.

The formulation comprises aids to preserving organisms and to deliver them to their target fields and – once there –to improve their activities. A technical concentrate of an organism that has been achieved by a particular process is called as a formulation, or product, which may be stored and put on sale commercially.

 

Why biofertilizers?

 

  • To enhance the efficiency of the externally applied nutrients

 

  • For transformation, mobilization, and availability of the fixed or unavailable forms of nutrients

 

  • To sustain crop production, maintain soil health and soil biodiversity in the long run

 

  • To integrate biofertilizers, biocontrol agents, and organic materials in farming system to provide stability and sustainability in production

 

  • To promote eco-friendly agriculture and organic farming

 

Chemical fertilizers vs. biofertilizers

 

Excessive and indiscriminate use of chemical fertilizer may lead to:

 

  • Decrease inorganic carbon in soil

 

  • Decrease in population and diversity of beneficial soil microflora

 

  • Increase in soil acidity, alkalinity, and hardening

 

  • Excessive use of N fertilizers may affect ground water and human and animal health

 

  • Environmental pollution
  • Deterioration in soil health

 

  • Imbalance in soil nutrient status

 

Though the effect of microorganisms is slow, it is sustainable on long term basis and would provide following benefits:

 

  • May increase crop yield up to 15%

 

  • Reduce external application of N and P by 25%

 

  • Stimulate plant growth

 

  • Slow but long term effect

 

  • Activate soil system biologically

 

  • Restore natural fertility

 

  • Provide protection against drought and some soil borne fungal pathogens

 

  • Low cost

 

  • Easy to use

 

  • Eco-friendly

 

  • Maintain soil biodiversity

 

Types of formulations

 

There are varieties of formulation both in liquid and solid forms. The main types currently used for biofertilizers have been classified into dry products (dust, granules, and briquettes) and suspensions (oil or water-based and emulsions). A wide range of formulations with additives is available in the market.

 

  • Dry inoculum products

 

These formulations comprise dust, granules, and briquettes, based on the particle or aggregate size. Wettable powders are also included in this group, which are formulated as a dry powder mixed with water as a carrier, just before use. Dust mainly contain 30% of an organism by weight.

 

  • Granules, pellets, capsules and briquettes inoculum

 

Granules are discrete masses 5-10 mm3 in size; pellets are >10 mm3, dusts and briquettes are large blocks up to several cubic centimeters; dust, these products contain an inert carrier holding the organisms. Carriers include clay minerals, starch polymers, and ground plant residues. Soft carriers, e.g. Bentonite, disburse quickly to release the organism. The product can be coated with various materials to slow down or control the rate of release, which also depends on unit size. The concentration of organisms in granules is 20-30%.

 

  • Wettable powders inoculum

 

This formulation is predominant among all commercial products and comprises charcoal, lignite, vermiculite powders blended with 3% gum to make them stable during storage on the shelf and readily stick with seeds.

 

  •  Liquid formulations

 

Liquid biofertilizers are special liquid formulation containing not only the desired microorganisms and their nutrients, but also special cell protectants or substances that encourage the formation of resting spores or cysts for longer shelf life and tolerance to adverse conditions.

Temperature is important for the shelf life of microbial products, and it can affect their activity before or after application. Colonization proceeds at field temperatures in the cropping season but slows at lower or higher temperatures.

Bacteria used for plant growth need the plant surface to be wet to establish them. These needs can be overcome by liquid formulation as products contain a humectant.

It is always mentioned on the packet of microbial inoculum that it must be kept away from direct sunlight. To counter harmful effects of sunlight, sunscreens are added to liquid formulations.

The pH of a product plays a vital role in liquid inoculum preparations. A buffer, therefore, is maintained by adding some additives, which render better shelf life in liquid.

 

Carrier-based inoculants

In India, peat-like material available in the Nilgiri Valley has been found to be a good carrier. Lignite and charcoal are also used widely as carrier materials.

Culture broth is grown in a suitable medium in large flasks on a shaker for small requirements or in fermentors for large requirements. The powdered carrier (passing through 100 mesh sieve) is neutralized with CaCO3 and autoclaved at 15 lbs pressure for 4 hours. After cooling, a high-count broth is mixed so as to attain a 40% moisture-holding capacity of the carrier. The carrier and the broth are mixed either manually or using a mechanical mixer, cured in trays for 2-5 days, and packed in polythene bags.

Method of application

 

(a) Seed treatment

The seeds can be coated with either carrier based or liquid based inoculums in following manner in groundnut (Figure 1). The size of the container will depend on the amount of the seed required for sowing as well as seed size. Generally, biofertilizer of groundnut can be mixed with the seeds in a plastic container as the size of seed is large in groundnut as compared to other agricultural commodities. The use of 10 % sugar or 40% gum Arabic in the suspending fluid enhances the survival of rhizobia on seed.

Carrier- based cultures are mixed with the minimum amount of water to form a slurry (sugar or gum Arabic, may be added), and seeds are added to the slurry so as to uniformly coat the seeds with the inoculants. The seeds are dried in the shade and sown immediately.

 

(b) Through FYM

For even distribution and spread over the large area, biofertilizers can be applied after mixing with the FYM but sufficient moisture must be maintained to prevent drying up of the inoculums otherwise the inoculums load will go down. In groundnut, FYM enriched with biofertilizers is applied in set furrows and then seeds are sown in the furrows and irrigation is provided.

 

(c) Through irrigation water

Liquid biofertilizer diluted sufficiently can also be applied in irrigation channels to spread all over the field uniformly. This will also maintain the viability of the cells and prevent desiccation death of the live biofertilizer cultures.

 Quality control

In India, the Indian Standards Institution ISI has evolved methods to check the quality of inoculants and issue ISI marks to qualified producers (ISI Bulletin No. IS: 8268-1976). The following are the relevant clauses from the ISI specifications for rhizobial cultures:

 

  • The inoculant shall be a carrier-based one

 

  • The inoculant shall contain a minimum of 108 viable cells of Rhizobium per gram of the carrier on dry mass basis within 15 days of manufacture and 107 within 15 days before the expiry date marked on the packet when the inoculant is stored at 25-30 oC.

 

  • The inoculant shall have a maximum shelf life of 6 months from the date of its manufacture.

 

  • The inoculant shall not have any contamination by other microorganisms.

 

  • The pH of the inoculant shall be between 6.0 and 7.5

 

  • The inoculant shall show effective odulation on all those species/cultivars listed on the packet before the expiry date

 

  • The carrier material shall be in the form of a powder that is, peat, lignite, peat-soil, humus or similar materials neutralized with calcium carbonate and sterilized.

 

  • The manufacturers shall control the quality of broth and maintain records of tests.

 

  • The inoculant shall be packed in 50-75 µ low-density polyethylene packets or any other suitable container.

 

  • Each packet shall be marked legibly to give the following information:
  1. name of the product, specifically as Rhizobium inoculant,
  2. leguminous crop for which intended,
  3. name and address of the manufacturer,
  4. type of carrier
  5. batch or code number,
  6. date of manufacture,
  7. date of expiry,
  8. net quantity meant for 0.4 ha, and storage instructions worded as follows: “Store in cool place away from direct sun and heat.”

 

Precautions to be taken

 

  • Store biofertilizer packets in cool and dry place away from direct sunlight and heat

 

  • Use right combinations of biofertilizers

 

  • Rhizobium is crop specific, so use in legume crop

 

  • Do not mix with chemicals unless compatible

 

  • While purchasing ensure that each packet is provided with necessary information like name of the product, name of the crop in which it is to be used, name and address of manufacturer, date of expiry and manufacture, batch number and instruction for use

 

  • Use the packet before expiry, only on the specified crop, by recommended method

 

  • Biofertilizer are live product and require care in storage

 

  • For the best results use both N and P biofertilizers

 

  • Use of biofertilizers is being emphasized along with chemical fertilizers and organic manures

 

  • Biofertilizers are not replacement of fertilizers but can supplement their requirement

 

Status of biofertilizers in groundnut

 

Legumes can potentially fix about 80% of their nitrogen and also can contribute to the yield of subsequent crops. However, the potential is seldom realized due to one or the other constraints, abiotic or biotic. In groundnut, the biological nitrogen fixation is further compounded by the promiscuity of the crop. However, identification of competitive, efficiently nodulating, nitrogen-fixing strains of rhizobia and their inoculation can solve the problem of ineffective nodulation by native rhizobia in groundnut. Some bacteria have been developed over the years for inoculation in groundnut:

Status of different categories of biofertilizers available for groundnut developed at DGR, Junagadh or elsewhere

Isolates
Bradyrhizobium, Rhizobium IGR6, IGR40, NC92, Tt9, TNAU14, NRCG4, NRCG9, NRCG22
Bacillus polymyxa Pseudomonas striata Pseudomonas spp BM8, BM4
Pseudomonas fluorescens PGPR1, PGPR2, PGPR4, combination of PGPR1, PGPR2, and PGPR4
Consortium of beneficial microorganisms Compatible strains of Brady rhizobia, PGPR, PSM
Vesicular- Arbuscular Mycorrhizae Gigaspora margarita, Glomus mossese, Gigaspora scutellospora

 

Different biofertilizers of groundnut

 

(a) Rhizobium

This belongs to bacteria group and is the classical example of symbiotic nitrogen fixation. The bacteria infect the legume root and form root nodules within which they reduce molecular nitrogen to ammonia, which is readily utilized by the plant to produce valuable proteins, vitamins and other nitrogen containing compounds. It has been estimated that different legume crops could fix 40-250 Kg N/ha/year by the microbial activities of Rhizobium.

The successful nodulation of groundnut by a strain of Rhizobium depends on its ability to overcome antagonism and competition from other soil microorganisms and other strains of rhizobia.

Excess or insufficient soil moisture reduced nitrogen fixation and a 40% reduction in light intensity considerably reduced the rate of nitrogen fixation.

Deep sowing results in the development of elongated hypocotyls and poor rooting, nodulation, and nitrogen fixation especially in the Spanish types.

Application of cobalt has been reported to increase nodulation in high pH soils, and an increase in the rate of nitrogen fertilizer application decreases the rate of nitrogen fixation.

The use of various chemicals for control of pests affects nitrogen fixation. Application of seed dressing fungicides (e.g. Thiram) is detrimental to the Rhizobium coated onto the seed. Hence, an indirect method of Rhizobium application (furrow application) may be suitable under such situation. Three organophosphorus insecticides, Fensulphothion, Quinalphos, and Disulfoton had no adverse affect on nodulation. Carbofuran had no affect on nodulation whereas Thimet, Heptachlor, and Dasanite reduced the number of nodules. Application of the above insecticides, however, did not reduce nitrogen fixation. Experiments conducted at the National Research Centre for Groundnut, Junagadh revealed that Thiram and Bavistin are not toxic to Bradyrhizobium strains, IGR 6 and IGR 40, even at 100 ppm. Therefore, these strains can safely be inoculated on groundnut seeds, pre-treated with the fungicides.

Nodulation, nodule development, and nodule functioning are all reduced at low iron concentrations. Groundnuts are very susceptible to lime-induced iron deficiency. Like many soil microorganisms, Brady rhizobia can secrete siderophores to aid Fe uptake. One strain which produces siderophores, NC92, was found to nodulate groundnuts better in low Fe conditions than strain TAL 1000, which does not. Bicarbonate adversely affected nodulation and nodule functioning and effects were more pronounced on nitrogen fixing plants than on those given mineral N. Lack of response to inoculation with Rhizobium NC 92 at one of the two locations, out of 11 multi-location trials on groundnut in AICRPO were attributed to toxic levels of manganese.

Commonly occurring soil fungi, actinomycetes, and bacteria compete with rhizobia for the limited pool of nutrients available in the rhizosphere and inhibit growth by excretion of antibiotics. Protozoans like Colpoda can drastically reduce soil Rhizobium titres. Therefore it is essential to develop rhizobial strains with high saprophytic competence. Competitive ability of the inoculants strains with the native rhizobial population affects the nodule occupancy and nitrogen fixation. Development of competitive strains in a highly promiscuous crop like groundnut is challenging because the native flora is generally more competitive than the inoculants strains. Several competitive strains (NRCG4 and NRCG9) of rhizobia have been identified in groundnut having multiple inhibitory effects on native flora like antibiosis, bacteriocin gene, and siderophore production.

 

Inoculation with effective Rhizobium strains

Many newly cleared fields lack Rhizobium species that nodulate groundnut. Rhizobium inoculation has increased yields in several field experiments in India. However, nodules formed by the native strains may not fix nitrogen, or their fixation rates may often be inadequate. Lack of response to inoculation and low yield in groundnut are probably due to competition from ineffective strains in the soil. Experiments conducted by ICRISAT at Patancheru and other centers of the All-India Co-ordinated Research Project on Oilseeds (AICORPO) showed that inoculation with an effective Rhizobium strain NC92 increased the yield of groundnut cultivar ‘Robut 33-1’ in such fields where ineffective native strains were present.

Inoculation with NC92 also increased the yield of the cultivar ‘JL 24’ at Junagadh in Gujarat. Two strains of Bradyrhizobium, IGR 6 and IGR 40 have been identified at National Research Centre for Groundnut, Junagadh. Inoculation of groundnut with IGR 6 and IGR 40 increased the groundnut yield by 11%. In Tamil Nadu, a strain of Rhizobium (TNAU 14) and another of Bradyrhizobium (Tt9) are used for commercial manufacture of inoculants. Inoculating the soil with a suspension of peat containing rhizobia in water has been found successful.

In so far as the quantum of fertilizer savings due to inoculation is concerned, a field trial by All India Co-ordinated Research Project on Biological Nitrogen Fixation (AICRP-BNF) at Coimbatore showed that inoculation of rhizobia along with Pseudomonas PS 2 at 100% N and P gave maximum pod yield and substituted for 25% N and P. Groundnut rhizobia decline after rice cultivation due to adverse effect of waterlogging, so inoculation is needed each year. In a three-year study on vertisols by the AICRP-BNF, Parbhani, Rhizobium inoculation of groundnut grown with recommended dose of NPK (25:50:30) increased the pod yield by 3.9 q/ha while FYM alone @ 5t/ha increased it by 1.5 q/ha, combined application of FYM and Rhizobium increased it by 7.3 q/ha. Nodulation, N and P uptake, Rhizobium population in soil, etc., were all enhanced due to combined application of FYM and Rhizobium.

Application of sulphur @ 40 kg S/ha in combination with Rhizobium was found beneficial for nodulation parameters and groundnut kernel yield in a field experiment on a sandy loam. Protein and oil content were increased by S fertilization.

To overcome the problem of competition and develop highly nodulating and nitrogen-fixing strains of groundnut rhizobia, a large number of groundnut rhizobia were isolated at the Directorate of Groundnut Research having multiple competitive traits like bacteriocinogeny, antibiosis (Figure 2) and siderophore (Figure 2).

Subsequently, two highly competitive and efficiently nodulating (Figure 3) nitrogen-fixing strains of groundnut rhizobia, NRCG4 and NRCG9 were identified by testing in pots and field at the experimental sites of NRCG (Figure 3; Figure 4) which outperform standard cultures like IGR6, IGR40, NC92 and TAL 1000 (Table 2). Inoculation of these strains gave a higher number of nodules as compared to uninoculated control and standard cultures (Figure 5).

 

 

Table 2. Results of the trials conducted at NRCG in field with competitive strains of groundnut rhizobia (NRCG4 and NRCG9)

 

Isolate Pod Haulm Nodule N in N in
yield yield /plant plant kernel
(kg/ha) (kg/ha) (%) (%)
Control 1876 2655 69 1.42 4.20
TAL1000 2035 2970 84 1.63 4.66
NC92 2020 2910 91 1.66 4.77
NRCG4 2215 3005 112 1.73 4.86
NRCG9 2195 2845 105 1.78 4.84

Subsequently, the competitive strains were tested in a farmers field, in and around, Junagadh (Figure 6) and the potential of NRCG4 and NRCG9 were demonstrated (Table 3). Inoculation of NRCG4 and NRCG9 significantly improved groundnut yield over uninoculated control and standard inoculant, NC92.

 

Table 3. Comparison of the demonstration of competitive strains of groundnut rhizobia (NRCG4 and NRCG9) at experimental station and in farmers’ field (cultivar GG2)

Isolate Pod yield (kg/ha)
NRCG Vadal (1) Vadal (2) Vadal (3) Vadal (4) Pooled mean
Control 1460 1265 1370 1578 1465 1427
NRCG4 1765 1470 1605 1870 1710 1684
NRCG9 1690 1505 1680 1805 1825 1701
NC92 1565 1425 1305 1635 1765 1539

 

After that, these two highly competitive and efficiently nitrogen-fixing strains (NRCG4 and NRCG9), were tested in AICRP(G) centers for three years and found highly promising and outperformed the standard strains like NC92 and TAL1000. These two Bradyrhizbium strains have been recommended for application in groundnut as a seed treatment.

 

(b) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR)

 

The mechanisms of PGPR-mediated enhancement of plant growth and yields of many crops are not yet fully understood. However, in groundnut, the possible explanations (Figure 7) include:

 

  • ability to produce ACC deaminase to reduce the level of ethylene in the roots of the developing plants thereby increasing the root length and growth
  • ability to produce hormones like indole acetic acid (IAA), gibberellic acid and cytokinins asymbiotic nitrogen fixation ammonification help in nodulation and biological nitrogen fixation antagonism against soil-borne phytopathogenic fungi of groundnut like Aspergillus niger , Sclerotium rolfsii and Aspergillus flavus by producing siderophores, β-1,3-glucanase, chitinases, antibiotics, fluorescent pigment, volatile substances and cyanide solubilization of mineral phosphates mineralization and mobilization of other nutrients alleviation of biotic and abiotic stresses by modulating the functional environment of plant tissues

 

Efforts have been made in India in the past to develop plant growth promoting rhizobacteria suitable for groundnut under rain-fed situations. At the National Research Centre for Groundnut, Junagadh, nine different isolates of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria were selected from a pool of 233 rhizobacterial isolates obtained from the groundnut rhizosphere by ACC-deaminase activity. Subsequently, all the isolates were tested for production of other plant growth promoting traits like phosphate solubilization; nitrogen fixation; production of siderophore, antifungal metabolites (Figure 8), hormones; antifungal activities against major soil-borne fungal pathogens and other related attributes. Initial screening was also made by enhancement of seedling vigour (Figure 9), and enhancement of plant growth in pots (Figure 10). All the nine isolates were identified as Pseudomonas spp (Table 4). Four of these isolates viz., PGPR1, PGPR2, PGPR4 and PGPR7 (all fluorescent pseudomonads) were the best in producing siderophore and IAA in addition to characters like tri-calcium phosphate solubilization, ammonification (Table 4) and in vitro inhibition of Aspergillus niger and Aspergillus flavus. The performances of these selected plant growth promoting rhizobacterial isolates were evaluated for three years in the pot and field trials (Figure 11). Seed inoculation with three isolates viz., PGPR1, PGPR2 and PGPR4 resulted in significantly higher pod yield than the control, in pots, during rainy and post-rainy seasons. The contents of nitrogen and phosphorus in soil, shoot and kernel were also enhanced significantly in treatments inoculated with these rhizobacterial isolates in pots during both the seasons. In the field trials, however, there was wide variation in the performance of the PGPR isolates in enhancing the growth and yield of groundnut. Seed bacterization with PGPR1, PGPR2 and PGPR4 significantly enhanced pod yield (23-26%, 24%-28%, and 18-24%, respectively), haulm yield and nodule dry weight over the control (Table 5). Seed bacterisation with PGPR1, PGPR2 and PGPR4 suppressed the soil-borne fungal diseases like collar rot of groundnut caused by Aspergillus niger and PGPR4 also suppressed stem rot caused bySclerotium rolfsii.

 

Table 4. Attributes of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria developed at NRCG (DGR), Junagadh, isolated from groundnut

 

Isolates Root Zone of Catechol IAA Identity
length (cm) siderophore siderophore (mg/L)
(mm) (mg/mg pro)
PGPR 1 8.40 5.0 0.106 3.6 P. fluorescens
PGPR 2 9.10 7.6 0.121 7.8 P. fluorescens
PGPR 3 7.90 Pseudomonas sp.
PGPR 4 8.87 12 0.137 9.3 P. fluorescens
PGPR 5 8.03 4.4 0.102 P. fluorescens
PGPR 6 7.97 4.6 0.075 3.9 P. fluorescens
PGPR 7 9.00 9.5 0.109 11.8 P. fluorescens
PGPR 8 8.07 4.3 0.054 Pseudomonas sp.
PGPR 9 7.6 4.5 0.072 Pseudomonas sp.
Control 6.03

 

These strains of pseudomonads were also compatible with the seed treating chemicals like Carbendazim. By results obtained at on-farm trials, it was proposed to evaluate these cultures in AICRP(G) centers and TAR-IVLP program in different villages in Junagadh. The cultures were evaluated at eight different locations for three consecutive years under rain-fed situations under AICRP(G). In the majority of the locations, inoculation of PGPR1, PGPR2, and PGPR4 and their combinations in the form of a consortium enhanced the growth, yield and nutrient uptake of groundnut significantly. Pooled results of 3 years revealed that seed inoculations with either PGPR1, 2 or 4 increased pod yield by 16.5 to 18.1 % over the control with cultivar JL24. These PGPR isolates have been recommended for groundnut cultivation under rainfed situations during Kharif groundnut workshop held at Bangalore from 11-13th April’ 2003. This was followed by 100 odd FLDs conducted all over the country to demonstrate the inoculation effects of PGPR on growth and yield of groundnut and yield response of 18% was obtained with a B:C ratio of 2.46 (ICBR obtained was 6.4). There was significant enhancement of pod and haulm yield of groundnut under TAR-IVLP programmes taken up in different villages at Junagadh and nearby localities demonstrated over a period of time with yield advantage of 7-11%.

 

Benefits that can be harnessed using PGPR in groundnut:

 

  1. Yield enhancement of more than 10% Improvement in soil health
  2. Improvement in nutrient mobilization and uptake of P, K, N, Fe, Zn, etc.
  3. Produces plant growth promoting substances like IAA and iron chetating substances like siderophore
  4. Control of incidence of soil-borne fungal pathogens in groundnut Easy to apply
  5. Eco-friendly
  6. Nominal in cost
  7. Very fast growing and ease in large scale multiplication
  8. Compatible with seed treating chemicals like Bavistin (Carbendazime)/Thiram
  9. Can be used both for rain-fed and irrigated groundnut

 

c) Consortia of beneficial bacteria

 

Reasons for consortia

  1. Single organism does not have all the properties to provide PGP traits
  2. There is chance of failure of inoculation of single strain as backup does not exist

Thus, application of a mixed biofertilizer formulation comprising mutually compatible strains of PGPR, PSM, and rhizobia would be best available option to provide a cascade of benefits to the plant

 

Development of consortia and effective delivery system

As inoculation of a single strain of microorganism may not be sustainable for providing all required benefit to plant as well as there is a chance of failure, a mixed biofertilizer formulation would be best available option to provide a cascade of benefits to the plant by different organisms in the mixture. The mixture would also provide an essential backup in case of failure of an organism. Thus, consortia were identified comprising mutually compatible and competent strains of phosphate solubilizing microorganisms (PSMs), groundnut-rhizobia and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) after pair-wise testing for compatibility. DGR has developed two such consortia (Table 6) of beneficial bacteria as biofertilizer mixture application of which can enhance the yield of groundnut by 10-20%. The consortium-I comprised of PGPR ( Pseudomonas fluorescence biovar V BHU1 and Pseudomonas maculicola S1(6)), PSB (Pseudomonas sp. BM8; Bacillus polymyxa BM4), and rhizobia (NRCG4 and NRCG9). The consortium II comprises Pseudomonas sp. C185 + Pseudomonas sp. ACC3 + Bacillus megaterium + Pseudomonas sp. ACC10 + groundnut rhizobia NRCG 22 and NRCG4 (Table 6). The consortium can take care of plant growth promotion, better phosphate solubilisation, and nitrogen fixation. After that, the consortia were tested at NRCG, Junagadh with significant yield improvements (Figure 13) and in AICRP(G) centers as a seed treatment and application of the consortium enhanced the yield of groundnut by 10-21% in groundnut in AICRP(G) trials and recommended for rainfed groundnut cultivation. The population dynamics of individual members of the consortia were also determined using intrinsic antibiotic resistance patterns which indicated that majority of the members of the consortia gave sizeable population. The population of the microorganisms in the rhizosphere soil ranged from 0.02 X 106 to 34.0 X 10 6 cfu/g during the crop duration. The consortium has been formulated as talcum-based powder and found very efficient and recommended for seed treatment for both irrigated and rain-fed situations. The benefits of consortia have been demonstrated through FLDs and on-farm trials at different parts of the country.

 

Table 6. Compatible strains of groundnut rhizobacteria identified for development of consortia

Organisms Identity Phenotypes
PSM Bacillus polymyxa BM4 Sid+MPS+IAA+
Bacillus megaterium Sid+MPS+
Pseudomonas sp. ACC10 Sid+MPS+IAA+
Pseudomonas sp. BM8 Sid+MPS+
PGPR Pseudomonas fluorescens C185 Sid+MPS+IAA+ACC+
Pseudomonas sp. ACC3 Sid+MPS+IAA+ACC+Amm+
Pseudomonas fluorescens  BHU1 Sid+MPS+IAA+ACC+
Pseudomonas fluorescens  S1(6) Sid+MPS+IAA+Afa+  (A. niger) ACC+
Groundnut-rhizobia NRCG 4 Sid+IAA+
NC 92 Sid+IAA+
NRCG22 Sid+IAA+
TAL1000 Sid+IAA+
NRCG9 Sid+IAA+

 

 

Delivery system

Different delivery systems of a consortium of beneficial bacteria were evaluated in field trials with groundnut cultivar TG37A. The beneficial bacterial consortium consisted of PGPR (Pseudomonas fluorescens BHU1 and Pseudomonas maculicola S1(6)), PSM (Pseudomonas sp. BM8 and Bacillus polymyxa BM4) and groundnut rhizobia (NRCG 4 and NC 92). The material for carrier /delivery systems for consortium were FYM, talcum powder, kaoline, sterile farm soil, charcoal, groundnut seed, and irrigation water.

Application of the consortium as a formulation in FYM proved to be the best and resulted in 18% enhancement in pod yield over un-inoculated control (Table 7). This also resulted in an increase in the length of shoot and root, the yield of haulm, shelling turnover and hundred kernel mass.

Table 7. Effect of application of different delivery systems of beneficial consortium comprising compatible beneficial bacteria on groundnut yield, cultivar TG 37A

 

Treatments Pod yield (kg/ha) Haulm yield (kg/ha)
Control 1329 4225
Irrigation 1380 4588
FYM 1575 5200
Charcoal 1395 4400
Kaoline 1360 4320
Soil 1530 5012
Seed 1496 4363
Talcum 1403 4560

Benefits that can be harnessed using consortia of beneficial bacteria in groundnut:

  1. Yield enhancement up to 20% Improvement in soil health
  2. Improvement in nutrient mobilization and uptake of P, K, N, Fe, Zn, etc.
  3. Enhancement in biological nitrogen fixation through use of efficiently nodulating and nitrogen-fixing strains of rhizobia
  4. Dependence on nitrogenous fertilizer can be minimum Enhancement in phosphate solubilization and uptake
  5. Produces plant growth promoting substances like IAA and iron chetating substances like siderophore
  6. Strains of the consortium are compatible to each other Easy to apply
  7. Eco-friendly
  8. Nominal in cost
  9. Very fast growing and ease in large scale multiplication
  10. Compatible with seed treating chemicals like Bavistin (Carbendazime)/Thiram
  11. Can be used both for rain-fed and irrigated groundnut

 

d) Azospirillum

It belongs to bacteria and is known to fix the considerable quantity of nitrogen in the range of 20-40 Kg N/ha in the rhizosphere of plants such as cereals, millets, oilseeds, cotton , etc. The efficiency of Azospirillum as biofertilizers has increased because of its ability to induce abundant roots in several plants like rice, millets, and oilseeds. A considerable quantity of nitrogen fertilizer (25-30%) can be saved by the use of Azospirillum inoculant. Azospirillum cultures synthesize considerable amount of biologically active substances like vitamins, nicotinic acid, indole acetic acid, gibberellins, etc. which help plants in better germination, early emergence, and better root development.

 

(e) Azotobacter

 

It is the most important and well-known free-living nitrogen-fixing aerobic bacterium. It is used as a biofertilizer for plants like rice, cotton, vegetables, oilseeds, etc. Azotobacter has been found to produce some antifungal substance which inhibits the growth of some soil fungi like Aspergillus.

 

(f) Phosphate solubilizing microorganisms (PSM)

The most important aspects of the phosphorus cycle are microbial mineralization, solubilization, and mobilization, besides chemical fixation of phosphorus in soil. The mineralization of organic phosphorus, which is left over in the soil after harvesting, or added as plant or animal residues to the soil, takes place through enzymatic activity of microorganisms.

Phosphate solubilizing bacteria and fungi play an important role in converting insoluble phosphatic compounds such as rock phosphate, bone meal and basic slag and particularly the chemically fixed soil phosphorus into available form. These special types of microorganisms are termed phosphate solubilizing microorganisms (PSM). Such bacteria and fungi can grow in media where Ca 3(PO4)2, FePO4, AlPO4, apatite, bonemeal, rock phosphate or similar insoluble phosphate compounds are the sole source of phosphate. Such organisms not only assimilate phosphorus but also cause a large amount of soluble phosphate to be released more than their requirements. These efficient microorganisms are found to mineralize insoluble phosphates into soluble form due to enzymatic activity. The bacteria save P2O5 up to 30-50 kg /ha. PSM produced organic acids like malic, succinic, fumaric, citric, tartaric acid and alpha-ketoglutaric acid hasten the maturity and thereby increase the ratio of grain to straw as well as the total yield.

Some phosphate solubilizing bacteria were tested in India and found to enhance the pod yield, dry nodule weight, haulm yield and nutrient uptake significantly over control in Groundnut. Pseudomonas striata produced about 11% increase in groundnut yield, increasing the pod yields from 0.9 t/ha in control to 1.0 t /ha upon inoculation.

For the purpose, two promising phosphate solubilizers, both pseudomonads, PSM3 and PSM5, were identified and found to give higher pod yield, plant biomass, P content in shoots and kernels as compared to uninoculated controls. These two cultures exhibited better performance than Pseudomonas striata. Inoculation with Pseudomonas fluorescens BM6, Pseudomonas striata and consortium resulted in significant increase in pod yield, maximum with the inoculation of a consortium of PSM cultures (13%). The best combination of culture x dose was consortium + 40 Kg P2O5 as SSP which resulted in 14% increase in pod yield.

 

(g) AM fungi

Some of the soil-borne fungi are capable of mobilizing P /making it available from the immobile form of phosphorus by its hyphal structures. These soil microbes have a mutualistic association with plants. Besides phosphorus, these fungi also mobilize zinc and sulphur.

The term mycorrhizae means “fungus root” to denote the association between certain soil fungi and plant roots. Mycorrhizal plants increase the surface area of the root system for better absorption of nutrients from soil especially when the soil are deficient in phosphorus.

The endomycorrhizae are known as arbuscular mycorrhizae which possess special structures known as vesicles and arbuscules, the latter helping in the transfer of nutrients from the soil into the root system.

Since large-scale production of AM in axenic culture is not yet attained, inocula have been produced in pot cultures or small field plots on plants grown under carefully controlled conditions, to avoid contamination by plant pathogens. Such inocula have comprised infected roots or spores and hyphae trapped in soil, peat and clay carriers.

Mechanism of improved plant growth due to AMF application:

 

  1. Nutrient uptake
  2. Production of growth promoting substances
  3. Beneficial interactions between soil microorganisms Drought tolerance
  4. Disease resistance
  5. Nearly 25 to 50% of phosphatic fertilizers can be saved through inoculation with efficient AM fungi.

 

Application of AM fungi in groundnut

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AM fungi) are reported to enhance uptake of macro- (P & K) and micro-nutrients (Fe, Zn, B, Mo, etc.) in many crops besides enhancing the rhizosphere zone and mining of water under moisture-deficit stress conditions. In marginal and sub-marginal soil, AM fungi are expected to exert better performance as compared to normal soil conditions. Therefore, to enhance nutrient uptake and mobilization in groundnut, four strains of AM fungi viz., Glomus etunicatum, Glomus fasciculatum, Glomus mosseae, and Gigaspora scutellospora were tested both in pots and field conditions, to evaluate the effect. Inoculation of different AM fungi (1500-2000 chlamydospores/ 100 g of soil) had significantly better effects on groundnut growth regarding shoot and root biomass; nodule number and mass; and pod yield of groundnut, cultivar GG 2, as compared to un-inoculated control (Table 8). There was a remarkable increase in root volume, and root biomass in AM fungi inoculated treatments, and in some cases, the root volume increased nearly two folds (inoculation with Glomus mosseae). Studies on VAM root colonization (Figure 14) indicated that there were significant root colonization and formation of arbuscules and vesicles upon inoculation of the AM fungi as compared to un-inoculated control.

Reasons for non-responsiveness of biofertilizers

 

  • Difficult to visually perceive differences of about 10% or less

 

  • Hidden benefit of increased proportion of nitrogen fixed from air accrue

 

  • Beneficial responses not obtained in 1/3 of the trials

 

  • Spatial variability on physical properties, fertility gradients

 

  • Not conducting experiments in the same field, no knowledge of the previous history of plots, differential fertilization of the previous crop affects present crop, not measuring NO 3 -N to account for/understand these differences

 

  • Mid-season drought affects inoculated plants eliminating earlier observed differences

 

  • Improper site selection, shade effects of trees, too few replications
  • Improper handling of biofertilizers & improper application

 

  • Not measuring N yield or keeping at least cereal controls for legumes

Conclusions

Application of biofertilizer is a long term sustainable perspective and should not be thought for a short term gain. Application of effective and competent strains of biofertilizer can improve the yield of groundnut and another crop on a sustainable basis by improving the nutrient supply, creating healthy soil environment and suppressing soil-borne pathogens. Nevertheless, the application of biofertilizer should be made with prudence.

 

Source-

  • Directorate of Groundnut Research.

 

No Comments

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.